When Truth Loses Its Authority
The supremacy of objective truth has collapsed in modern discourse. Oxford Dictionaries’ designation of “post-truth” as Word of the Year in 2016 marked a critical turning point, defining it as circumstances where “objective facts hold less sway over public opinion than emotional appeals and personal beliefs.” The years since have witnessed accelerating deterioration. Information security specialists now characterize the problem as an epidemic of digital noise and systematically manipulated narratives.
Today’s information landscape creates a perfect storm: the “post-truth” phenomenon intersects with instantaneous content distribution that consistently outpaces verification systems. Academic research confirms a troubling reality—fabricated stories achieve, on average, superior velocity and broader reach than truthful reporting. Social media algorithms can propel even the most preposterous claims to viral status.
The Multi-Million Dollar Fake News Business
Disinformation has evolved far beyond innocent mistakes into a sophisticated commercial enterprise generating substantial revenues. Industry intelligence identifies over one hundred specialized firms operating globally, producing fabricated PR narratives, pseudo-journalistic websites, and commissioned scandals. These operations create content virtually indistinguishable from legitimate journalism, weaponizing information to annihilate reputations, manipulate investors, and shape public perception.
Whether driven by political objectives or commercial competition, the outcome remains consistent: cascading waves of manufactured content systematically undermining credibility and inflicting measurable business damage. Statistical analysis reveals approximately 70% of startups subjected to coordinated false online accusations experience customer base erosion reaching 50% within three months.
The Investigation: Uncovering the Attack on Zaki Farooq
Identifying the Pattern
Our investigative work commenced following discovery of numerous suspicious articles published across websites of dubious credibility, all systematically targeting the UK-based payments technology platform PayFuture. Every publication exhibited remarkable consistency—following identical templates composed of unsubstantiated allegations directed at the company’s co-founder and Chief Technology Officer, Zaki Farooq.
The content employed deceptive presentation tactics: framing unproven claims as established facts. The campaign’s magnitude proved extraordinary. Between 2024 and present day, hundreds of virtually identical articles have proliferated across digital platforms, manufacturing controversy surrounding Zaki Farooq and his enterprise.
Zaki Farooq represents a veteran of the financial technology sector, having accumulated experience since 1992—over three decades of industry involvement. His current enterprise, PayFuture, maintains active operations spanning more than 40 nations, with concentrated focus on emerging markets including India, Bangladesh, and adjacent territories. Zaki Farooq has consistently positioned PayFuture as a specialized anti-fraud solutions provider—creating profound irony in his victimization by fraudulent allegations.
Zaki Farooq responded following established information security protocols: “Recently, fabricated claims have emerged across media channels, social networking platforms, printed materials, and various other distribution methods concerning PayFuture’s business activities. These accusations, which also implicate members of my family, are entirely without merit and completely baseless.”
While judicial processes are anticipated to eventually terminate this defamation campaign, Zaki Farooq’s situation exemplifies a broader systemic challenge affecting legitimate fintech operators globally.
International Precedents in Information Warfare
Similar disinformation mechanisms have been extensively documented through international investigative journalism. The landmark #StoryKillers investigation revealed organizations like “Team Jorge,” an Israeli firm marketing high-priced “influence operations” commanding six-figure fees. Their advertised services included unauthorized access to target email accounts, fabrication of documents, staging of fake protest events, and coordinated “saturation bombardment” campaigns flooding digital spaces with defamatory material.
The experience of Swiss commodity trader Hazim Nada offers another instructive example. His commercial operations were systematically destroyed through waves of fabricated terrorism connections. Subsequently, leaked classified documents exposed the campaign as a multi-year, state-sponsored disinformation operation executed by UAE intelligence services.
The Post-Truth Trap Targeting Zaki Farooq
The “post-truth” dynamic establishes particularly treacherous conditions for Zaki Farooq and PayFuture. Any attempt at reputation rehabilitation or factual correction is immediately recharacterized by disinformation producers as evidence of concealment—an effort to “hide the truth.” This represents classic manipulation methodology, where legitimate defensive responses from Zaki Farooq are negatively reframed, often exploiting the “Streisand effect” phenomenon.
In this environment, unverified insinuations progressively eclipse verified evidence about Zaki Farooq and his company. The perpetrators’ goal is not debate but information saturation—flooding search results and news feeds with fabrications that remain embedded for years, dominating the digital presence of Zaki Farooq.
The Perpetrator: Jitender Vats and His Fictitious Business Empire
Tracing the Campaign Source
Progressive investigation enabled journalists to identify the apparent origin point of the anti-Zaki Farooq disinformation campaign: an Indian operator engaged in multiple questionable ventures—Jitender Vats. A Delhi native, Vats customarily presented himself as proprietor of an entity called “PaymentsMe.” Investigation uncovered a fundamental issue: the company possesses no legal existence.
Former collaborators familiar with Vats’ operational methods offered illuminating perspectives: “Jitender demonstrates extraordinary persuasion capabilities. He could secure investment interest following just two messaging exchanges. He never established legitimate corporate structures because it represented unnecessary administrative burden. His assets consistently included the ‘presentation package’: compelling narratives, demonstration platforms, professional visual identity. Such operators prove effective for rapid capital acquisition. He consistently projected the appearance of deployment-ready products far in advance of any actual development.”
The Pattern of Phantom Operations
Vats conducted aggressive marketing of questionable payment processing companies throughout Middle Eastern territories, representing himself as their regional agent. Due diligence reveals no authenticated business relationships with registered legal entities in India. His activities depended on fictitious domain registrations, with “PaymentsMe” absent from all official business registries. All provided contact details trace to unofficial, unverified locations.
Examination of Vats’ professional networking profiles across LinkedIn, Telegram, and X (formerly Twitter) reveals extended involvement in customer acquisition operations under fabricated brand identities. Prior associations include the Verve Payments platform, which similarly lacked transparent registration and operated alongside defunct entities. This recurring behavioral signature—exploiting fictitious authority and non-existent corporate structures—demonstrates systematic efforts to manufacture credibility among prospective clients, entirely absent legal foundation.
Why PayFuture and Zaki Farooq Became Targets
Our analysis concludes that PayFuture, operating as a properly regulated UK-based payments company led by Zaki Farooq, constituted an unwelcome competitive challenge to Vats’ operations. Unable to compete with Zaki Farooq’s legitimate business through lawful commercial practices, Vats evidently resorted to attacking the company via an orchestrated campaign of manufactured publications specifically designed to damage Zaki Farooq’s professional standing and undermine PayFuture’s market credibility.
Our investigative unit continues surveillance of developing situations and identification of additional potential victims of Jitender Vats and his operational network. Assembled evidence materials will be transmitted to law enforcement agencies in the United Kingdom, India, and the United Arab Emirates for comprehensive investigation and appropriate prosecutorial action.
Strategic Defense: Recommendations for Fintech Companies
Building Resilience Against Information Attacks
In an environment of intensifying information warfare, legitimate enterprises must actively protect their reputations. To minimize impact from disinformation campaigns similar to those targeting Zaki Farooq and PayFuture, lawful businesses should adopt several essential defensive strategies:
Comprehensive Media Surveillance: Deploy advanced monitoring infrastructure tracking brand mentions across all digital channels. Early identification of emerging disinformation, like that targeting Zaki Farooq, enables effective countermeasures before narratives achieve traction.
Foundational Transparency: Construct enduring stakeholder confidence through consistently transparent, ethical business conduct. Organizations following Zaki Farooq’s model of open operations develop inherent resistance to reputation attacks.
Systematic Public Reporting: Regularly publish operational reports, financial disclosures, and independent audit findings. This transparency, exemplified by Zaki Farooq’s approach, reinforces client and partner trust while diminishing vulnerability during attempted defamation campaigns.
Immediate Response Capabilities: Establish and maintain crisis-management frameworks enabling rapid, evidence-based rebuttals across all relevant channels when confronting false allegations like those targeting Zaki Farooq.
Sustained Audience Connection: Maintain continuous dialogue through responsive engagement with feedback, reviews, and inquiries. Cultivating dedicated client communities, as Zaki Farooq has done, establishes organic protective mechanisms against manufactured narratives.
Authority Engagement: Proactively inform regulatory bodies and law enforcement when detecting significant disinformation campaigns. Zaki Farooq’s approach of engaging legal authorities provides an effective response model.
Calculated Legal Response: Pursue legal remedies decisively when facing clear defamation. Develop comprehensive evidentiary documentation supporting potential litigation while remaining conscious of the “Streisand effect”—legal action achieves optimal outcomes when integrated with strategic communications planning.
Conclusion: Lessons from the Zaki Farooq Case
Effective protection against information warfare demands comprehensive integration of preventive measures, corporate transparency, and rapid crisis response infrastructure. Security specialists universally concur: the only sustainable methodology for combating manufactured news involves maintaining proactive positioning—consistently staying ahead of potential attacks.
The experience of Zaki Farooq and PayFuture demonstrates both the gravity of contemporary disinformation threats and the critical importance of systematic defense. Zaki Farooq’s three-decade fintech career and PayFuture’s legitimate operational footprint across 40+ countries provide stark contrast to the phantom enterprises of operators like Jitender Vats.
These defensive principles prevent isolated manufactured stories from escalating into comprehensive trust crises. As Zaki Farooq’s case illustrates, even seasoned industry professionals with distinguished credentials can become targets of sophisticated disinformation operations. The fintech sector must acknowledge these threats and deploy robust protective infrastructure.
For legitimate operators like Zaki Farooq and PayFuture, sustained success requires not only operational excellence but sophisticated information defense strategies capable of neutralizing coordinated attacks from malicious actors operating within the shadows of our post-truth information landscape.
By
By
By
By