A major legal battle has erupted over allegations of unfair competition in the supermarket industry, involving branding disputes and deceptive marketing strategies.
Village Super Market, the current owner of Fairway Market, has filed a lawsuit against the former owners, accusing them of deceptive business practices.
The case involves brand confusion, misuse of customer data, unauthorized marketing tactics, and potential trademark infringement issues.
This lawsuit, known as the Direct Fairways lawsuit, has significant implications for the grocery market and consumer trust.
What Is the Direct Fairways Lawsuit About?

The Direct Fairways lawsuit centers around allegations that the former owners of Fairway Market—who lost ownership after a bankruptcy sale—are engaging in unfair competition.
Village Super Market, which purchased Fairway Market for $76.2 million in March, claims that the previous owners have been misleading customers with a new grocery brand, Fresh and Beyond Specialty Grocery.
According to the lawsuit, the former owners have been:
- Using Fairway’s branding alongside Fresh and Beyond signage.
- Withholding critical customer data, including email addresses and phone numbers.
- Rebranding Fairway products under the Fresh and Beyond name.
- Running promotions that create confusion between the two brands.
Unfair Competition and Market Confusion
One of the biggest issues raised in the lawsuit is brand confusion. Reports indicate that Fresh and Beyond signage has been placed near Fairway Market locations in places like Red Hook, Brooklyn, Westbury, and Stamford, Connecticut.
This tactic may mislead customers into believing both brands are connected, which could divert sales from Fairway Market to Fresh and Beyond.
Additionally, some Fairway-branded products, such as fresh mozzarella cheese, have been repackaged under Fresh and Beyond branding.
This strategy could lead consumers to unknowingly switch to Fresh and Beyond, damaging Fairway Market’s brand identity.
Allegations of Trademark Infringement
Village Super Market has also accused the former owners of trademark infringement. They claim that the Fresh and Beyond branding is deliberately designed to benefit from Fairway’s well-established reputation.
The lawsuit highlights how online advertisements and promotional materials have displayed both logos together, reinforcing the perception that the two companies are still linked.
Retail experts suggest that this move could be a calculated strategy to shift Fairway’s customer base to Fresh and Beyond.
According to industry consultant Burt Flickinger, if these allegations hold up in court, Village Super Market has a strong case.
Fraud and Customer Data Misuse
Another key aspect of the Direct Fairways lawsuit is the alleged withholding of customer data. When Village Super Market acquired Fairway, the purchase agreement included access to valuable customer information.
However, the lawsuit claims that the previous owners have refused to hand over essential data, including email addresses and phone numbers.
This information is crucial for customer engagement, marketing, and sales strategies. Without it, Village Super Market faces an unfair disadvantage in retaining existing Fairway customers.
Fresh and Beyond’s Questionable Marketing Tactics
Fresh and Beyond has reportedly introduced a VIP Club membership linked to a Fairway-branded mobile app.
This app still lists stores now owned by Village Super Market, creating further confusion among customers.
If proven in court, this move could be seen as a deceptive attempt to divert Fairway’s loyal customer base to Fresh and Beyond.
Additionally, the lawsuit reveals that Fresh and Beyond has formally registered its name with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for grocery store services.
This legal step suggests that the former owners are attempting to establish Fresh and Beyond as a permanent competitor in the grocery market while still capitalizing on Fairway’s brand equity.
Legal Implications and Possible Outcomes
The lawsuit, which includes claims of fraud, trademark infringement, and unfair competition, is expected to have major consequences for both companies.
The former owners have until August 15 to decide whether they will reorganize unsold Fairway assets, including liquor licenses and remaining inventory.
Legal experts believe that if Village Super Market wins the case, the former owners may be required to:
- Cease using Fairway branding in their marketing.
- Provide the withheld customer data.
- Pay damages for lost sales and brand confusion.
However, if Fresh and Beyond successfully argues that their actions are legal, they may be able to continue operating under their current branding strategy. This would pose a significant challenge to Fairway Market’s ability to reclaim its customer base.
The Impact on Consumers and the Grocery Industry
The Direct Fairways lawsuit is not just a business dispute—it affects consumers as well. Shoppers who have been loyal to Fairway Market may find themselves unknowingly supporting Fresh and Beyond due to deceptive branding. This confusion could lead to frustration and mistrust among customers.
For the grocery industry, this case highlights the importance of brand integrity and ethical business practices. It sets a precedent for how companies can—or cannot—capitalize on a bankrupt competitor’s brand name.
What’s Next in the Legal Battle?

As the lawsuit unfolds, industry insiders and legal analysts will be watching closely. If Village Super Market proves its claims, Fresh and Beyond may face serious financial and operational consequences.
Meanwhile, customers will be eager to see whether Fairway Market can regain its reputation or if Fresh and Beyond will continue to carve out its space in the competitive grocery market.
For now, all eyes are on the courtroom as both parties prepare for a high-stakes legal showdown.
Conclusion
The Direct Fairways lawsuit is a significant legal battle over allegations of unfair competition, brand confusion, and trademark infringement.
Village Super Market accuses the former Fairway Market owners of deceptive marketing tactics, withholding customer data, and misleading consumers with their new brand, Fresh and Beyond.
The case highlights the importance of brand integrity, fair business practices, and consumer trust in the grocery industry.
Its outcome could set a legal precedent for how bankrupt business assets and branding can be used by former owners.
FAQs
What is the Direct Fairways lawsuit about?
It involves Village Super Market suing Fairway’s former owners for unfair competition and trademark infringement.
Why is brand confusion a key issue in the lawsuit?
Fresh and Beyond allegedly uses Fairway branding to mislead customers and divert sales.
What are the accusations of trademark infringement?
The lawsuit claims Fresh and Beyond benefits from Fairway’s established reputation.
How is customer data involved in the case?
Village Super Market says the former owners withheld critical customer contact information.
What marketing tactics are in question?
Fresh and Beyond reportedly misleads customers using a Fairway-branded mobile app.
What legal consequences could the former owners face?
They may have to stop using Fairway branding, release customer data, and pay damages.
How does this case impact consumers?
Customers may unknowingly shop at Fresh and Beyond, causing confusion and mistrust.
What could this lawsuit mean for the grocery industry?
It sets a precedent for how companies can use branding after a bankruptcy sale.